It’s not what you look at, it’s what you see
On April 2nd, 2022, a new museum opened on the site of what was once Betteshanger Colliery in the Kent coalfield. The Kent Mining Museum draws on collections built up over the years by the East Kent coalfield communities. Coal was first discovered in East Kent in 1890, while Betteshanger was the last pit to close in the Coalfield in 1989. The in-between history is important, complex and contested. When we observe this landscape, and visit the Museum, we still risk doing an injustice to local working class history set within a complex terrain. Mapping any terrain has to be multi-layered and multi-dimensional. It must include the people who lived and worked there. There needs to be aesthetically satisfying representations of the whole – geological, ecological, historical, socio-cultural, political as well as human; women alongside men. It must include fulsome illumination of a vibrant, troubled, resilient, questioning, collectivist culture, and how people experienced and made sense of their work, lives, economic and political change, as well as Kent and a wider world. There will be gaps in the portraiture, but we do have various individual stories to help us enrich the picture. Here lie many layers of struggle, harsh labour, death, suffering, solidarities, conflict, heroism, courage, loss, political and educational commitment. We can learn to see, imaginatively, through the eyes of some of those most intimately involved in mining in Kent and in the making of their working class culture.

Oral history
I was once part of a small research team at the University of Kent in the early 1990s, doing oral history interviews among some of the miners: focusing on their lives, and the role and meaning of workers’ education in shaping experience and consciousness. Little was known, for instance, about the influence of workers’ education in general and especially at times of explicit conflict with mine owners: when challenging inhumane working practices, for instance, during strikes and in struggles to imagine a better, less class-ridden and exploitative, as well as socially, materially and politically democratic order.

Strikes
One of only two miners’ strikes in the 2nd World War took place at Betteshanger Colliery in 1942 (the other was in Yorkshire). The strike’s origins lay in a switch to a new coalface that was much narrower and harder to work. After an arbitrator ruled that the quotas asked of the miners were achievable, the miners objected, and the strike began on the 9th of January. The story of that strike and a later one in 1984/5 is documented in various sources, including in some of the stories we were able to gather. In 1942, the eventual terms agreed by the Mine Owners were more or less what the miners had asked for, but only after bitter struggle and a period of imprisonment for three of the leaders. The Kent Miners, it should be noted, were the last to return to work in 1985 after that contentious national strike, leaving a festering wound in mining communities like Kent to this day.

Workers education
From early on the Kent miners had a reputation for militancy. A number of them who moved to Kent had been blackballed in other parts of the country. Some walked the whole way from places like South Wales because of poverty and joblessness. Many, it seems, brought with them strong, militant feelings towards owners alongside a wider questioning of the structures of ownership in mining, and indeed the nature of capitalism as a whole. Workers’ education developed apace after World War One as adult education more generally gained ground following the 1919 Report of the Ministry of National Reconstruction which proclaimed adult education to be a vital and permanent national necessity. An infrastructure involving various agencies was strengthened. The Workers Educational Association and Oxford Delegacy for Extramural Studies had a prime role in Kent (and more widely in industrial communities as well as some rural areas). Strange, maybe, to associate Oxford University with miners and militancy, except there was a strong Socialist commitment, and even Communist affiliation, among some of the tutors who worked in Extramural Studies. There was one tutor named A.T. D’Eye, who became an Oxford Extramural Resident Tutor in Kent. For a while, he was Secretary to the Red Dean at Canterbury Cathedral, Hewlett Johnson. D’Eye was his lifelong companion and mentor on socialism. D’Eye taught in the Kent coalfield and one of his most successful classes - on International Relations - began in the 1930s. There are suggestions that this particular class had a role among miners’ leaders in pursuing the 1942 strike, in wrestling with the issues it raised, and in representing the strike to the wider world.

Glimpses into lost worlds: two vignettes
Jack Dunn was a trade union leader and member of the class: his interview provides a vignette to begin to fill some of the gaps in our mapping. Jack was born in 1915 in South Staffordshire. There were six brothers and four sisters and Jack ‘couldn’t go to Grammar School’, he said, ‘because of the cost’. He moved to Kent in 1929 looking for work. He talked of ‘injustice’ in relation to an elder brother who was injured in an underground accident. He likened Snowdown to Dante’s Inferno: ‘atrocious’, ‘seven pints of water a shift’, just to survive.

Jack described Betteshanger as a ‘much better pit than Snowdown’, but there were frictions over meal breaks or ‘snap time’. Conflict too over injury compensation when people were forced to return to work by coal owners before their injuries were healed. Jack was something of the autodidact who was interested in Hegel and the Communist Party; and began attending union meetings and then D’Eye’s class. The Miners’ Welfare Club at Mill Hill, Deal, was its location. It had a library of political tracts and novels. D’Eye’s class covered socialism, capitalism, the Russian Revolution; Tom Payne and the Rights of Man; the French Revolution, the British Empire and Colonialism. The imagination was unashamedly internationalist, the impulse critical and questioning.

Power, community and cultivating self-expression
Jack described union meetings at Betteshanger. ‘A whole maelstrom of factors created the atmosphere’: the Catholic Church, the WEA branch, and there were ‘politics for breakfast, tea and dinner’. Jack became Chair of the WEA Branch for many years. This work focused on ‘understanding power, community, and cultivating the ability to express yourself.’ ‘We never considered ourselves inferior to anyone’. ’We wanted’, he said, ‘union members to be technically educated too’, to be able to negotiate with the bosses from a position of strength. They would attend Canterbury Technical College while 10-14 students would go abroad, every year, say to France to further their political education. There were day and weekend schools at Ruskin and Baliol Colleges, Oxford. There were links with the miners in Nord Pas de Calais, Sweden, Denmark as well as in every Eastern European country. We can observe in these human, educational and cultural narratives an internationalist educational spirit now largely dissipated in a ‘post-industrial’ world.

A generation later
Arthur Clay belonged to the generation that followed Jack. He was born in Yorkshire in 1925. His Dad was a miner who got work at Betteshanger. ‘I was a foreigner with a Yorkshire accent’ and ‘sat the exam for Dover Grammar School, couldn’t afford the uniform, the books etc. In a family of eight impossible’. I had ‘a feeling of vast relief not going to grammar school.’ Class is deeply embedded in this human and relational landscape.

Arthur got a job at Betteshanger aged seventeen. ‘I looked up to the Jack Dunns of this world,’ he said. ‘The Mill Hill course was funded by the Miners’ Welfare; there were miners who were extremely well read, and they were always the most significant people in the pit’. Jack Dunn would, in the canteen, ‘often lead the discussion’, Arthur said: ‘information and ideas on politics would be flung around and debated’ (no doubt references to Dante too). But this was no exercise in ideological propaganda, more a matter of debate, enquiry and a quest for knowledge. There was even an odd royalist in the group, but dialogue continued. Arthur subsequently participated in many educational courses, later becoming a Youth Worker, then an Education Officer for Community Education in Thameside. He returned to Kent on retirement, re-joining the self-same Industrial Relations Class. We glimpse in such stories the search for enlightenment, individually and collectively; alongside turmoil in the 1940s, 60s and 80s. In the 60s the Vietnam War was one preoccupation, with large miner-led demonstrations in Dover, with representatives of the VietCong participating. We get glimpses of the women, too, and changing gender roles. Many mining women were politicised in the 1984 Strike, the feminist resonance of which resounds to this day.

Back to the future
A good place to start to learn more of the history and landscape of Kent mining and miners is to visit the Museum. There are countless artefacts and talking images of some of the men and women of the Kent Coalfield. They talk about pits, lives, struggles, conflict and the determination to create a better social order. There are books and other references to engage with – see below – helping create a complex portraiture of these communities and their values, over time. But there is a danger and potential sadness too. The pits have closed, and the surviving men and women who helped shape a rich consciousness of life and learning grow old. We can easily fall into enormous condescension from our post-industrial, more individualistic, ecologically troubled perspectives. We should pause for a moment. Echoing the words of the great Labour historian, E.P.Thompson, men and women like these lived through times of change and social as well as economic struggle. In some of their causes we might find insights into social evils which we have yet to cure. And in their determined creation of democratic, economic, cultural and educational institutions that we have largely lost, and need to reinvigorate. To learn from the struggles and resilience of the men and women of the Coalfield can be inspirational in our own struggles for a more sustainable, and democratised world.

References and further reading

The 1919 Report. The final and interim reports of the Adult Education Committee of the Ministry of Reconstruction (1918-1919). Reprinted edition (1981) with Introductory Essays by Harold Wiltshire, John Taylor and Bernard Jennings. Nottingham University Press.
Butler. J. (2011). The Red Dean of Canterbury; the public and private faces of Hewlett Johnson. Scala.
Goldman, L (1995). Dons and Workers. Oxford and adult education since 1850. Clarendon Press.
Mack, A. (2015). Spheres of Justice in the 1942 Miners’ Strike: An essay in Historical Ethnography. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations. 36, 29-57.
Portelli, A. (2006). ‘What makes Oral History Different’. In R. Perks & A. Thomson, The Oral History Reader. Routledge
Rose, J. (2010) The intellectual life of the British Working Classes 2nd edn. Yale University Press.
Thompson. E.P. (1963/1991). The Making of the English Working Class. Penguin.
Tyndall, A. (2001) ‘Patriotism and Principles. Order 1305 and the Betteshanger Strike.’ Historical Studies in Industrial Relations. 12, Autumn, 109-30.
West, L. (2017) ‘Resisting the enormous condescension of posterity: Richard Henry Tawney, Raymond Williams and the long struggle for a democratic education.’ International Journal of Lifelong Education. 36, 1-2, 12, 129-144.